The argument is missing one main part of the topic is why was He carrying a knife on school property? If he did not have a knife in the school property there would not have been a killing on the school grounds, what was he doing on the school grounds since he was not allowed to be on school property.
The argument is missing one main part of the topic is why was He carrying a knife on school property? If he did not have a knife in the school property there would not have been a killing on the school grounds, what was he doing on the school grounds since he was not allowed to be on school property.