There was a good reason why folks called Charlie Kirk a hateful person: He WAS a hateful person, not willing to have a fair debate on his views. AFA his death, I was not celebrating wildly. At the same time, I was also NOT mourning his passing as a North Korean would have had to mourn Kim Jong-Il when he died.
AFA. Try using real English not ghetto speak. All u need to know about your racist black comment. Dumb ass, uneducated, ghetto dweller! You support the reason kirk was so popular
“It disgusts me to my core that people can call Charlie Kirk a “hateful” person.”
Jesus was hated, too. In John 15:25, He says, “They hated me without a cause.”
CK was not a hateful person. He brought facts, research, logic, conviction to his points of view while those who accused him of being hateful only brought innuendo, lies, emotion and vitriol to the discussions. He invited challenge, actual discussion and dialog but not 1 opposing person of any age brought actual facts to dispute his presented truth and facts. He pointed out ignorance and stupidity without calling people either of them and didn’t even raise his voice in anger while doing so.
There was a good reason why folks called Charlie Kirk a hateful person: He WAS a hateful person, not willing to have a fair debate on his views. AFA his death, I was not celebrating wildly. At the same time, I was also NOT mourning his passing as a North Korean would have had to mourn Kim Jong-Il when he died.
Can you show us some examples.
AFA. Try using real English not ghetto speak. All u need to know about your racist black comment. Dumb ass, uneducated, ghetto dweller! You support the reason kirk was so popular
wow , you are really FUBB
“It disgusts me to my core that people can call Charlie Kirk a “hateful” person.”
Jesus was hated, too. In John 15:25, He says, “They hated me without a cause.”
CK was not a hateful person. He brought facts, research, logic, conviction to his points of view while those who accused him of being hateful only brought innuendo, lies, emotion and vitriol to the discussions. He invited challenge, actual discussion and dialog but not 1 opposing person of any age brought actual facts to dispute his presented truth and facts. He pointed out ignorance and stupidity without calling people either of them and didn’t even raise his voice in anger while doing so.