What Does the Law Say About the ICE Shooting in Minnesota?

20
4841
What Does the Law Say About the ICE Shooting in Minnesota?
IMAGE ABOVE FROM VIDEO BELOW

TOP COMMENTS FROM VIDEO BELOW

Funny how all the news networks don’t show the 2nd video.

Media is all about inciting emotion, journalism is all about investigating facts and discovering truth. I really miss the absence of journalism in mainstream media.

20 COMMENTS

  1. LAWS? are we going back to LAWS? abandoning the “feelings” thing, that was working so well…. for the socialist bastards on the bench and the anarchist on the street? I don’t buy it….. they must be punished.

    • Interesting you mention laws. You voted for a guy who attempted to overturn the election he lost. He is a convicted felon 34 counts ,a jury trial. 87 million judgement for sexually assaulting Jean Carroll.

      Let’s clean up your own house before throwing rocks.

      • Well, have you forgotten already about the overturned sham you call convictions? Hold on to your tu-tu, because once these Dim excuses for convictions are in higher courts, they will be overturned ALSO. Not to worry though, as MANY of your liberal socialist are NOW being investigated and will get convicted for crimes against the Constitution and America. Happy New Year, NOW as you and evil fellow criminals will not be happy much longer.

      • Please wipe after you spew your lies and obfuscations, Jim.

        Section 609.066 — Authorized Use Of Deadly Force By Peace Officers. Tim Walz signed 609.066 in 2020 allowing law enforcement officers to use deadly force before a car hits them, in so many words.

        Jim, you need some new democrat rhetoric, yours are worn out.

      • Once again you’re wrong on both accounts. There is so much evidence with ballet stuffing, machine tampering, kicking out Republicans in polling places, bags and stolen trucks showing up with illegal ballots, dead & insane votes, and so on and on…. You’d have to be a Kool-Aid drinker to not see the truth.

      • No proof that he even met Carroll! She’s a total douche and a whack job! Nothing compares to the POS Biden that you endorse! You’re just making a complete fool of yourself!

        • No proof to you however a jury of 12 heard the evidence and past judgment. These people unlike you promised to be fair and not have pre confirmed evidence. You know enough to make you just about the HS legal class you took.

  2. Timmy, BTW socialist bastards is why you have SS, Medicare, 40 hour work week. Police and fire departments, public parks and highways. Just to name a few. Go back to school and this time tak a history and economic class

    • Well if you ever took a history course, you WOULD know socialism has never worked and never will. You would also know that before 1913 and the passage of the Social Security Act, that the American government depended on tariffs for funding. As for as economic policy is concerned, a country cannot survive that continues to dole out funds to people and countries that have an agenda to destroy the Constitution, our capitalist economy, and America like your socialist loving Dims are trying to do.

      • Never worked? Maybe you should get out more. Most of Europe is socialized. You apparently lack comprehension skills. If you think it will not work then don’t use SS or FDIC banking insurance, or public parks and roads.

        What were you doing in history class when they talked the uncontrolled free enterprise never worked either.
        That’s why children can’t work in factories, that why companies can’t pay you in script, that’s why you get OT for over 40 work week. Honestly you are dumb as a rock

        • Europe is socialized is not working and didn’t during WWI & WWII. We bailed Europe out and till recent Germany has only done well due to our money and security that we’ve provided them. Europe expanded the communist EU which is killing them now and Europe is doing what they did during WWII right now, Fascist’s. So NO Jim it doesn’t work and you need to wake up, if that is possible, not holding my breath I want to live.

          • Well Europe after being rebuilt seem to be doing just fine. Maybe your tiny brain would learn something by going to Europe,

            The high speed trains everywhere and most Europeans don’t seem to want to be like you.

            We have visited over 10 European countries and they are quite prosperous.

            So let the adults in the room continue the conversation

  3. If an unbiased judge and jury were used, there certainly would be no convictions for the ICE officer who defended himself. In Minnesota? Who knows what delusional trial result could occur?

  4. I have watched the available videos, including the cell phone video made by Agent Ross, and have come to the conclusions that 1. Ms. Good was not trying to run down the agent, but 2. the agent was justified in using deadly force given the totality of circumstances. You mentioned a Minnesota statute ruling out hindsight. Which is to say (in my opinion) that what happened has to be evaluated with respect to the six seconds in which the relevant events transpired. This time interval is actually overstated if you look only at the time interval between her putting the car in motion and the agent discharging his weapon. The agent was holding his cell phone in his right hand but at about the same time Ms. Good puts the car in motion, transfers the cell phone to his right hand and draws and fires his sidearm. Just before he is struck the agent fires three times. The first shot goes through her windshield. The second shot follows .3 seconds after the first and the third.3 seconds after the second. The second and third shots appear to have been fired as the car was turning away from him and after the car struck him. This indicates a startle reaction of the fight, flight or freeze type. This reaction is instinctive and precedes rationale thought. Ms. Good by her panic attempt to escape set in motion a chain of events which led to this outcome. A moving car is like a charging rhino. You do not reason with it. There is no “murder” here. It is not even self-defense. It is akin to the Squib case from Freshman torts.

  5. Jim, the 2020 election was fraudulent. The fraud was in the mail-in ballots. The 34 “felonies” were misdemeanors that the statute of limitations had expired. Fat Alvin Bragg twisted the law and turned the misdemeanors onto “felonies” so Trump could be prosecuted. The Jean Carroll sexual “assault” is a hoax. She couldn’t remember which year the “assault” allegedly happened. Isn’t that something one would remember?

  6. I know you idiots like to claim fraud but you lost over 50 court cases claiming fraud. That’s why you never once proved fraud, never once proved mail in voting is fraud.

    You know the saying you can’t fix stupid, well look in the mirror and you will see an idiot looking back. Get back to me when you have FACTS!

    • You’re wrong and lost, in Minnesota which is a Leftist crap hole a couple was found guilty but the controlled judge over-ruled and let them go which happens when the powers to be are Democrats. So your partisan argument is fraudulent in bases, surprise!

  7. What I would like to know where was her common sense? Why would you risk having your child/or children be witnesses to her aggressive behavior and allow them to see this let alone be a witness to watching their mother being killed? This is typical liberal behavior, opposite from playing a hero role. Also negative words were exchanged to the Ice Officer starting this provocation. You can see he was hit from her car. This is the first time I saw that video! What the hell was he supposed to do, allow her to run over him?

  8. So, no matter which side you’re on, the bottom line is ACCORDING TO THE LAW this shooting was a justified act of using deadly force as self defense by a law enforcement agent. PERIOD

Leave a Reply to Thomas Paine Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.